Your Worksheet is Ready
CBSE - Class 12 Chemistry Coordination Compounds Worksheet
Worksheet Answers
Solution:
To determine the chemical formula of the coordination compound "Potassium tetrachloridopalladate(II)", we decompose the name into its constituent parts according to IUPAC nomenclature conventions:
We calculate the net charge of the complex ion $[PdCl_4]^n$ using the oxidation state of the metal and the charge of the ligands [Per the Rule of Coordination Algebra]:
$Charge = (\text{Oxidation state of metal}) + (\text{Number of ligands} \times \text{Charge of each ligand})$
$Charge = (+2) + (4 \times -1)$
$Charge = +2 - 4 = -2$
Thus, the complex anion is $[PdCl_4]^{2-}$.
To form a neutral compound, the total positive charge from the potassium ions must balance the negative charge of the coordination entity [Per the Principle of Electroneutrality]:
Let $x$ be the number of $K^+$ ions:
$x(+1) + (-2) = 0$
$x = 2$
Therefore, two $K^+$ ions are required to balance one $[PdCl_4]^{2-}$ ion.
Combining the counter-ion and the coordination entity, we place the cation first followed by the complex ion within square brackets:
Formula: $K_2[PdCl_4]$
Final Solution: K_2[PdCl_4]
Solution:
Both complexes feature a central iron atom in the $+2$ oxidation state. The ground state electronic configuration of neutral $\text{Fe}$ ($Z=26$) is $[Ar] 3d^6 4s^2$. Upon forming the $+2$ ion, the configuration becomes:
$\text{Fe}^{2+}: [Ar] 3d^6$
In both $[Fe(CN)_{6}]^{4-}$ and $[Fe(H_{2}O)_{6}]^{2+}$, the $3d$ subshell contains $6$ electrons. The difference in color arises from the nature of the ligands attached to the central metal ion.
According to the Crystal Field Theory (CFT), ligands split the degenerate $d$-orbitals of the metal ion into two sets: $t_{2g}$ (lower energy) and $e_g$ (higher energy). The magnitude of the crystal field splitting energy, denoted as $\Delta_o$, is determined by the spectrochemical series.
[Per the Spectrochemical Series: $\text{H}_2\text{O} < \text{CN}^-$]
The color of a coordination compound arises from the absorption of specific wavelengths of visible light, which promote an electron from the lower $t_{2g}$ orbitals to the higher $e_g$ orbitals. The energy of the absorbed photon corresponds to $\Delta_o$.
The energy relationship is given by: $E = h\nu = \frac{hc}{\lambda}$
Since $\Delta_o(\text{CN}^-) > \Delta_o(\text{H}_2\text{O})$, the wavelength of light absorbed ($\lambda = \frac{hc}{\Delta_o}$) will be shorter for the cyanide complex compared to the aqua complex.
| Parameter | $[Fe(CN)_{6}]^{4-}$ | $[Fe(H_{2}O)_{6}]^{2+}$ |
|---|---|---|
| Ligand Field Strength | Strong | Weak |
| Crystal Field Splitting ($\Delta_o$) | Large | Small |
| Wavelength of Absorbed Light | Short (Higher Energy) | Long (Lower Energy) |
| Color Observed | Complementary to absorbed light | Complementary to absorbed light |
The transition of electrons between $d$-orbitals (the $d-d$ transition) absorbs different portions of the white light spectrum due to the difference in $\Delta_o$. Consequently, the light transmitted or reflected—which determines the perceived color—is different for both compounds.
Final Solution: The different colors are due to the difference in the crystal field splitting energy ($\Delta_o$) caused by the nature of the ligands. $\text{CN}^-$ is a strong-field ligand causing large splitting (absorbing higher energy, shorter wavelength light), while $\text{H}_2\text{O}$ is a weak-field ligand causing smaller splitting (absorbing lower energy, longer wavelength light). This difference results in the absorption of light of different wavelengths, leading to different observed colors.
Solution:
To determine the chemical formula, we dissect the IUPAC name "Potassium tri(oxalato)chromate(III)" into its constituent parts based on coordination nomenclature rules [Per IUPAC Recommendations for Inorganic Chemistry]:
We calculate the net charge ($x$) of the complex ion $[Cr(C_2O_4)_3]^x$ using the oxidation state of the central metal and the charge of the ligands:
$x = (\text{Oxidation state of } Cr) + 3 \times (\text{Charge of oxalate ion})$
$x = (+3) + 3 \times (-2)$ [Charge of oxalate is $-2$]
$x = 3 - 6 = -3$
Thus, the complex anion is $[Cr(C_2O_4)_3]^{3-}$.
To form a neutral compound, the total positive charge from the potassium ions must balance the $-3$ charge of the complex anion. Since each potassium ion carries a charge of $+1$:
$(+1) \times (\text{number of } K^+) + (-3) = 0$
Number of $K^+$ = $3$
Combining the counter ion and the complex entity, we obtain $K_3[Cr(C_2O_4)_3]$.
Final Solution: $K_3[Cr(C_2O_4)_3]$
Solution:
Alfred Werner’s Coordination Theory (1893) provides the foundational framework for understanding the bonding in coordination compounds. It posits that metal atoms in coordination complexes exhibit two distinct types of valency:
| Postulate | Chemical Significance |
|---|---|
| Dual Valency | Metals exhibit both ionizable and non-ionizable valencies simultaneously. |
| Spatial Arrangement | Secondary valencies are oriented in fixed directions in space, defining the geometry of the complex. |
| Coordination Sphere | Ligands bound by secondary valency are tightly held and constitute the coordination entity, existing within square brackets. |
The following SVG illustrates the distinction between primary (dashed) and secondary (solid) valencies for a complex such as $[Co(NH_3)_6]Cl_3$.
Consider the complex $[Co(NH_3)_6]Cl_3$. Per the rules of coordination chemistry [IUPAC Nomenclature and Oxidation State Rules]:
Let $x$ be the oxidation state of $Co$.
$x + 6(0) + 3(-1) = 0$ [Since $NH_3$ is neutral and $Cl$ has a charge of $-1$]
$x = +3$
Final Solution: Werner’s postulates conclude that bonding in coordination compounds is governed by dual valency: primary valencies define the oxidation state and ionic character, while secondary valencies define the coordination number and stereochemical geometry of the complex.
Solution:
The complex ion is $\left[Co(NH_{3})Cl(en)_{2}\right]^{2+}$.
The complex exhibits two geometrical isomers based on the relative position of the two unidentate ligands ($NH_3$ and $Cl$) with respect to each other and the bidentate ligands.
| Isomer Type | Description |
|---|---|
| cis-Isomer | The $NH_3$ and $Cl$ ligands are adjacent to each other (90° angle). |
| trans-Isomer | The $NH_3$ and $Cl$ ligands are opposite each other (180° angle). |
Optical activity requires the absence of a plane of symmetry (chirality). [Per the Criterion for Optical Activity].
The total number of isomers identified is three:
Final Solution: The complex $[Co(NH_{3})Cl(en)_{2}]^{2+}$ exhibits two geometrical isomers (cis and trans), where the cis-isomer is further resolved into two optical enantiomers, resulting in a total of three distinct isomeric structures.
Solution:
In an isolated transition metal ion, all five $d$-orbitals ($d_{xy}$, $d_{yz}$, $d_{zx}$, $d_{x^2-y^2}$, and $d_{z^2}$) are degenerate, meaning they possess identical energy. When six ligands approach the metal ion in an octahedral arrangement along the Cartesian axes ($x, y, z$), the electrostatic field causes the degeneracy to split. Orbitals pointing directly at the ligands experience stronger electrostatic repulsion than those pointing between the axes [Per Crystal Field Theory].
The total energy separation between the two sets is defined as the crystal field splitting energy, denoted as $\Delta_o$.
| Orbital Set | Components | Energy Adjustment |
|---|---|---|
| $e_g$ | $d_{x^2-y^2}, d_{z^2}$ | $+0.6\Delta_o$ |
| $t_{2g}$ | $d_{xy}, d_{yz}, d_{zx}$ | $-0.4\Delta_o$ |
Final Solution: In an octahedral field, the five degenerate d-orbitals split into two sets: a triply degenerate lower-energy $t_{2g}$ set and a doubly degenerate higher-energy $e_g$ set, separated by an energy magnitude of $\Delta_o$.
Solution:
The complex ion given is $[PtCl_{2}(en)_{2}]^{2+}$. We first identify the coordination geometry and ligand arrangement:
The cis-isomer of $[PtCl_{2}(en)_{2}]^{2+}$ lacks a plane of symmetry and a center of inversion, existing as a pair of non-superimposable mirror images (enantiomers), labeled as $\Delta$ (delta) and $\Lambda$ (lambda) isomers.
The chirality arises due to the helical arrangement of the bidentate ethylenediamine ligands around the $Pt$ center. By applying the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog (CIP) priority rules for coordination compounds:
The trans-isomer is excluded from optical isomerism because it contains a plane of symmetry passing through the $Cl-Pt-Cl$ axis, making it achiral.
Final Solution: The optical isomers of $[PtCl_{2}(en)_{2}]^{2+}$ are the pair of enantiomers derived from the cis-geometric configuration, represented as the $\Delta$ and $\Lambda$ forms which are non-superimposable mirror images of each other.
Solution:
The complex is $K[Cr(H_2O)_2(C_2O_4)_2] \cdot 3H_2O$.
Given $CN = 6$, the geometry is octahedral. Since it contains two bidentate ligands, it exhibits geometrical isomerism (cis/trans) and optical isomerism.
The configuration of $Cr^{3+}$ is $t_{2g}^3 e_g^0$. There are 3 unpaired electrons ($n=3$).
Using the spin-only magnetic moment formula $\mu = \sqrt{n(n+2)} \mu_B$:
$\mu = \sqrt{3(3+2)} = \sqrt{15} \approx 3.87 \mu_B$. [Per Hund's Rule and Pauli Exclusion Principle].
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Oxidation State | +3 |
| Coordination Number | 6 |
| Configuration | $3d^3$ |
| Magnetic Moment | 3.87 BM |
| Stereochemistry | Octahedral (Cis/Trans isomers) |
Final Solution: The complex is Potassium diaquadioxalatochromate(III) trihydrate. It possesses an octahedral geometry with a $d^3$ configuration, a coordination number of 6, and a magnetic moment of 3.87 BM.
Solution:
The chemical formula provided is $[Ni(NH_{3})_{6}]Cl_{2}$. In this structure, the coordination sphere is represented by $[Ni(NH_{3})_{6}]^{2+}$, and the chloride ions ($Cl^{-}$) serve as the counter ions [Per the definition of Coordination Compounds, where the species inside the square brackets constitutes the primary coordination entity].
To determine the systematic name, we must first establish the oxidation state of the central nickel ($Ni$) atom. Let the oxidation state of $Ni$ be $x$.
Equation: $x + 6(0) = +2$
Result: $x = +2$. Thus, the oxidation state of Nickel is represented as $Ni(II)$.
We apply the following IUPAC naming protocols:
Combining the components: Hexaammine + nickel(II) + chloride.
Final Solution: Hexaamminenickel(II) chloride
Solution:
The central metal ion in the complex $[Ti(H_{2}O)_{6}]^{3+}$ is Titanium in the $+3$ oxidation state. The ground state configuration of a neutral Titanium atom ($Z=22$) is $[Ar] 3d^2 4s^2$. Upon losing three electrons to form $Ti^{3+}$, the configuration becomes:
$Ti^{3+} = [Ar] 3d^1$
[Per the Aufbau Principle and Hund's Rule, the remaining electron resides in one of the five degenerate $d$-orbitals.]
As six $H_2O$ ligands approach the $Ti^{3+}$ ion in an octahedral arrangement, the degeneracy of the $d$-orbitals is lifted due to the electrostatic repulsion between the ligand lone pairs and the metal $d$-electrons. The $d$-orbitals split into two distinct energy levels:
The single electron occupies the lower energy $t_{2g}$ orbital. When the complex absorbs light from the white light spectrum, the energy of the photon corresponds to the energy gap ($\Delta_o$) between the $t_{2g}$ and $e_g$ levels [Per the Bohr Frequency Condition: $\Delta E = h\nu = \frac{hc}{\lambda}$].
The electron is promoted from the $t_{2g}$ level to the $e_g$ level. This process is known as a $d-d$ transition. For $[Ti(H_{2}O)_{6}]^{3+}$, the energy absorbed corresponds to the yellow-green portion of the visible spectrum.
The color observed by the human eye is the complementary color of the light absorbed. According to the color wheel of visible light:
| Absorbed Color | Observed Color |
|---|---|
| Yellow-Green | Violet/Purple |
Since the complex absorbs the yellow-green light to facilitate the excitation of the $d$-electron, the transmitted or reflected light is perceived as violet.
Final Solution: The violet color of $[Ti(H_{2}O)_{6}]^{3+}$ arises from the excitation of the single $3d$ electron from the $t_{2g}$ level to the $e_g$ level ($d-d$ transition) upon the absorption of yellow-green light, resulting in the observation of the complementary violet color.
Solution:
Coordination isomers are compounds with identical molecular formulas but different arrangements of atoms or ligands. They are broadly categorized into two major divisions: Structural Isomerism and Stereoisomerism.
| Category | Sub-type | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Structural | Linkage | Due to ambidentate ligands bonding through different atoms. |
| Structural | Coordination | Exchange of ligands between cationic and anionic entities. |
| Structural | Ionization | Exchange of counter ions with ligands inside the sphere. |
| Structural | Solvate (Hydrate) | Difference in the number of water molecules coordinated. |
| Stereo | Geometrical | Different spatial arrangements (cis/trans) of ligands. |
| Stereo | Optical | Non-superimposable mirror images (enantiomers). |
Stereoisomers have the same connectivity but differ in spatial orientation [Per the VSEPR Theory].
Final Solution: Coordination compounds exhibit structural isomerism (Linkage, Coordination, Ionization, Solvate) and stereoisomerism (Geometrical and Optical). Each type arises from differences in connectivity or spatial orientation of ligands around the central metal ion as dictated by the coordination geometry.
Solution:
To name the coordination compound $K_{4}[Mn(CN)_{6}]$, we follow the IUPAC guidelines for coordination entities:
The complex adopts an octahedral geometry due to the coordination number of 6. Cyanide ($CN^-$) is a strong field ligand, which induces spin-pairing in the $d$-orbitals. [Per Crystal Field Theory]
| Parameter | Analysis |
|---|---|
| Geometry | Octahedral ($sp^3d^2$ or $d^2sp^3$ hybridisation) |
| d-orbital Splitting | $t_{2g}^5 e_g^0$ (due to strong pairing) |
| Unpaired Electrons ($n$) | 1 |
The magnetic moment ($\mu$) is calculated using the spin-only formula: $\mu = \sqrt{n(n+2)} \text{ B.M.}$
Since the number of unpaired electrons ($n$) = 1:
$\mu = \sqrt{1(1+2)} = \sqrt{3} \approx 1.732 \text{ B.M.}$ [Per the Bohr-van Leeuwen theorem]
Final Solution: The IUPAC name is Potassium hexacyanomanganate(II). The oxidation state is +2, coordination number is 6, electronic configuration is $[Ar] 3d^5$, stereochemistry is octahedral, and the magnetic moment is 1.732 B.M.
Solution:
To determine the chemical formula of the coordination compound Hexaammineplatinum(IV), we decompose the nomenclature into its constituent parts:
The total charge of a coordination entity is calculated by the sum of the oxidation state of the central metal atom and the charges of the coordinating ligands [Per Coordination Chemistry Rules].
Let $x$ be the total charge of the coordination entity:
$x = (\text{Oxidation state of Pt}) + (\text{Number of ligands} \times \text{Charge of } \text{NH}_3)$
Given that $\text{NH}_3$ is a neutral ligand with a charge of $0$:
$x = (+4) + (6 \times 0)$
$x = +4$
By convention, the central metal atom is written first, followed by the ligands in alphabetical order (only $\text{NH}_3$ is present here), enclosed within square brackets. The net charge is indicated as a superscript outside the closing bracket [According to IUPAC Recommendations for Coordination Nomenclature].
Formula = $[\text{Pt}(\text{NH}_3)_6]^{4+}$
Final Solution: $[\text{Pt}(\text{NH}_3)_6]^{4+}$
Solution:
To determine the oxidation state of the central metal ion (Cobalt, $\text{Co}$), we must identify the individual charges of all ligands coordinated to the metal within the coordination sphere $[ \text{Co}(\text{H}_2\text{O})(\text{CN})(\text{en})_2 ]^{2+}$.
| Ligand | Number of Ligands | Charge per Ligand |
|---|---|---|
| $\text{H}_2\text{O}$ (Aqua) | 1 | $0$ [Neutral molecule] |
| $\text{CN}^-$ (Cyano) | 1 | $-1$ [Anionic ligand] |
| $\text{en}$ (Ethylenediamine) | 2 | $0$ [Neutral bidentate chelate] |
Let the oxidation number of Cobalt be denoted as $x$. According to the algebraic sum rule for coordination complexes, the sum of the oxidation numbers of all atoms in the complex ion must equal the net charge of the coordination entity [Per IUPAC Nomenclature Rules for Coordination Compounds].
The equation is structured as follows:
$x + [1 \times (\text{charge of } \text{H}_2\text{O})] + [1 \times (\text{charge of } \text{CN}^-)] + [2 \times (\text{charge of } \text{en})] = \text{Net Charge}$
Substituting the values derived in Step 1 into the equation:
$x + [1 \times (0)] + [1 \times (-1)] + [2 \times (0)] = +2$
Solving for $x$:
$x + 0 - 1 + 0 = +2$
$x - 1 = +2$
$x = +2 + 1$
$x = +3$
The complex is an octahedral species where Cobalt acts as the central metal atom. The oxidation state $+3$ indicates that Cobalt has lost three electrons to form the complex, typically resulting in a $d^6$ configuration for the $\text{Co}^{3+}$ ion.
Final Solution: The oxidation number of the metal (Cobalt) is $+3$.
Solution:
Coordination compounds are essential for the survival of organisms as they serve as prosthetic groups in various enzymes and proteins [Per Biochemistry principles].
Coordination compounds are employed as therapeutic agents, particularly in oncology and heavy metal toxicity treatment [Per Pharmacology protocols].
Coordination chemistry facilitates the qualitative and quantitative determination of metal ions through colorimetric changes or precipitation [Per Analytical Chemistry axioms].
Ligands are used to selectively dissolve metals from ores, a process known as hydrometallurgical extraction [Per Extractive Metallurgy standards].
Final Solution: Coordination compounds are indispensable to biological systems (e.g., Hemoglobin), medicinal applications (e.g., Cisplatin for cancer), analytical detection (e.g., EDTA for water analysis), and industrial metallurgy (e.g., Cyanide process for gold extraction).
Solution:
The complex is formulated as $[Co(NH_{3})_{5}Cl]Cl_{2}$.
Final Solution: The complex is Pentaamminechloridocobalt(III) chloride. The oxidation state is +3, electronic configuration is $3d^{6}$, coordination number is 6, it has no stereoisomers, and the magnetic moment is 0 B.M. (diamagnetic).
Solution:
When an aqueous solution of ferrous sulfate ($FeSO_{4}$) is mixed with ammonium sulfate ($(NH_{4})_{2}SO_{4}$) in a 1:1 molar ratio, the resulting compound is a double salt known as Mohr's salt. The chemical reaction is defined as:
$FeSO_{4}(aq) + (NH_{4})_{2}SO_{4}(aq) + 6H_{2}O(l) \rightarrow FeSO_{4} \cdot (NH_{4})_{2}SO_{4} \cdot 6H_{2}O(s)$
[Per the definition of double salts, these compounds exist only in the solid state and dissociate completely into their constituent simple ions when dissolved in water.]
In aqueous solution, the dissociation follows:
$[FeSO_{4} \cdot (NH_{4})_{2}SO_{4} \cdot 6H_{2}O](aq) \rightarrow Fe^{2+}(aq) + 2NH_{4}^{+}(aq) + 2SO_{4}^{2-}(aq) + 6H_{2}O(l)$
Because the $Fe^{2+}$ ions are released into the solution as free, hydrated ions, they remain available to react with chemical reagents (e.g., potassium ferricyanide), thereby giving a positive qualitative test for iron(II).
When an aqueous solution of copper(II) sulfate ($CuSO_{4}$) is mixed with aqueous ammonia ($NH_{3}$) in a 1:4 molar ratio, a coordination complex is formed:
$CuSO_{4}(aq) + 4NH_{3}(aq) \rightarrow [Cu(NH_{3})_{4}]SO_{4}(aq)$
[Per Werner’s Coordination Theory, ligands coordinate to the central metal ion via dative covalent bonds.]
In this coordination entity, the $Cu^{2+}$ ion is surrounded by four $NH_{3}$ ligands in a square planar geometry. The coordination entity $[Cu(NH_{3})_{4}]^{2+}$ is highly stable and does not dissociate into free $Cu^{2+}$ ions in an aqueous medium. The dissociation equilibrium is defined as:
$[Cu(NH_{3})_{4}]SO_{4}(aq) \rightarrow [Cu(NH_{3})_{4}]^{2+}(aq) + SO_{4}^{2-}(aq)$
Since the concentration of free $Cu^{2+}(aq)$ ions in the solution is negligible (governed by the instability constant $K_{inst}$ of the complex), the solution fails to yield the characteristic qualitative tests associated with free copper(II) ions.
| Compound Type | Dissociation in Water | Availability of Metal Ion |
|---|---|---|
| Double Salt (Mohr's Salt) | Complete (Into simple ions) | High ($Fe^{2+}$ present) |
| Coordination Complex | Incomplete (Complex ion remains intact) | Negligible ($Cu^{2+}$ sequestered) |
Final Solution: Mohr's salt is a double salt that dissociates completely in water, releasing free $Fe^{2+}$ ions which react to give their characteristic test. Conversely, $[Cu(NH_{3})_{4}]SO_{4}$ is a coordination complex that retains its identity in solution, sequestering the $Cu^{2+}$ ion within the stable coordination entity, thereby preventing it from reacting during standard qualitative testing.
Solution:
The given coordination compound is $[Pt(NH_{3})_{2}Cl(NH_{2}CH_{3})]Cl$. This is a coordination sphere (cationic) followed by a counter-ion (anion).
Let the oxidation state of $Pt$ be $x$. The sum of the charges of all ligands and the central metal must equal the total charge on the coordination sphere. Since the counter-ion is $Cl^{-}$, the coordination sphere $[Pt(NH_{3})_{2}Cl(NH_{2}CH_{3})]$ must have a net charge of $+1$.
$x + 2(0) + 1(-1) + 1(0) = +1$
$x - 1 = +1$
$x = +2$
[Per the rules of oxidation state determination in coordination compounds]
According to IUPAC norms, ligands are named in alphabetical order regardless of the number of ligands:
The sequence is: Ammine, Chloro, Methanamine. Since there are two $NH_{3}$ groups, we use the prefix 'di-'.
Following IUPAC nomenclature for coordination compounds (prefix for ligands + name of central metal + oxidation state in Roman numerals + name of counter-ion):
Applying the standard rules for cationic complexes:
Resulting name: Diamminechloromethanamineplatinum(II) chloride
Final Solution: Diamminechloromethanamineplatinum(II) chloride
Solution:
The complex ion is given as $[NiCl_{4}]^{2-}$. The components are defined as follows:
Let $x$ be the oxidation state of Nickel ($Ni$).
The oxidation state of a chloride ion ($Cl^{-}$) is $-1$. [Per IUPAC Nomenclature rules for anionic ligands].
The sum of oxidation states in a complex ion equals the total charge of the complex:
$x + 4(-1) = -2$ [Per the Principle of Algebraic Sum of Oxidation States in a Coordination Complex]
$x - 4 = -2$
$x = +2$
The oxidation state of Nickel is $II$.
According to IUPAC recommendations for coordination compounds:
Combining the identified parts:
Final Solution: tetrachloridonickelate(II) ion
Solution:
The complex $[Co(NH_{3})_{2}Cl_{2}(en)]^{+}$ is an octahedral complex of the type $[M(AA)(a)_{2}(b)_{2}]$, where $M = Co^{3+}$, $(AA) = ethylenediamine$ (a bidentate ligand), $a = NH_{3}$, and $b = Cl^{-}$. The coordination number is 6.
Geometrical isomers arise from the relative orientation of the monodentate ligands ($Cl$ and $NH_{3}$) in the octahedral field. We classify these based on the position of the chloride ligands:
Optical activity requires the absence of a plane of symmetry (chirality).
| Isomer Type | Chirality | Optical Activity |
|---|---|---|
| trans-$[Co(NH_{3})_{2}Cl_{2}(en)]^{+}$ | Achiral | Inactive |
| cis-$[Co(NH_{3})_{2}Cl_{2}(en)]^{+}$ (d-form) | Chiral | Active |
| cis-$[Co(NH_{3})_{2}Cl_{2}(en)]^{+}$ (l-form) | Chiral | Active |
Final Solution: The complex exhibits three isomers: one optically inactive trans-isomer and a pair of optically active (d and l) cis-enantiomers.